Category Archives: Patriots Corner
Happy New Year!
The Turning of the Tide
Today is an important day in the history of this nation which 70 years ago, during World War II, was literally fighting for its very existence. On November 2nd,1942 British and Allied troops were engaged in a battle that would see the tide of war, which for over three years had rolled against Britain, now turn in her favour. That battle was El Alamein (October 23rd – November 4th, 1942) and so important was the victory that Prime Minister Winston Churchill was moved to declare “This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end, but it is perhaps the end of the beginning”.
Prior to this victory in the desert of Egypt the British and Allied forces had known defeat and humiliation from Dunkirk to Singapore and in the North African campaign had regularly suffered at the hands of the German Afrika Korps led by the brilliant Field Marshall Erwin Rommel, known as the “Desert Fox”. Churchill decided that something had to be done and so changed the army leadership, appointing General Alexander to overall command with General Gott as commander of the 8th Army (later to be known as the “Desert Rats”). Sadly, General Gott was killed in the plane taking him to his new command HQ and by default, General Montgomery took his place.
Bernard Law Montgomery, born in London in 1887, was a charismatic, inspirational and often controversial figure, a fine tactician and meticulous organiser who exuded confidence in everything he did. He inherited a demoralised army who appeared to be more in awe of the seemingly invincible Rommel than their own leaders. This was all about to change as Montgomery declared, upon taking up his new command, “There will be no more belly-aching and no more retreats”. He was true to his word since, in his first action as commander of the 8th Army, he was to achieve a defensive victory against Rommel at Alam Halfa in early September 1942.
Following on from this Montgomery (known as Monty to his men) made plans to go on the offensive and demanded men and materials from the Government to make this possible. He planned his campaign thoughtfully and methodically, insisting upon having an overwhelming attacking force, superior in numbers and equipment to the enemy, before risking the lives of his own men. This attitude came about as a result of the slaughter of World War I where Montgomery himself had been severely wounded. He was determined never to waste lives unnecessarily and once, when told by one of his soldiers that his most prized possession was his rifle, Montgomery responded “No, it isn’t. It’s your life and I am going to save it”.
Before beginning the attack, Montgomery ensured that there was complete ground and air co-operation and co-ordination. He insisted that his RAF counterpart be based in close proximity to his own HQ and that he be kept fully informed of what was going on. So it was, that with air superiority guaranteed and a large force of fully motivated soldiers newly equipped with freshly delivered American Sherman and Grant tanks, the attack on El Alamein (codename Operation Lightfoot) began with an almighty artillery barrage on the night of October 23rd, 1942.
Fighting their way through dense enemy minefields, sometimes 5 miles deep, the British and Allied troops, under fierce fire the whole time, achieved what Montgomery referred to as the “break-in”. Now followed the second stage, the “dogfight” when Rommel (who had just returned from illness) threw everything he had against the Allies in a powerful counter-attack. This had been predicted by and planned for by Montgomery and when Rommel failed to drive the Allies back Montgomery launched the third and final stage, the “break-out” (Operation Supercharge) on the night of November 1st. By November 4th it was all over, the enemy was in full flight and the battle won.
The effect on the morale of the army and the public at home was enormous, church bells were rung and people unashamedly celebrated the first piece of really good news that they had experienced in over three years of war. The last word belongs with Churchill, who after the war had ended, stated “Before Alamein we never had a victory, after Alamein we never had a defeat”. Victory was still a long way off however and came at a terrible price before its end (in Europe at least) in May, 1945 when Field Marshall Montgomery (later Viscount Montgomery of Alamein) personally accepted the surrender of the German northern armies.
Going it Alone
Where it all Began
A Close Run Thing
As we all know, Wellington, aided by the late arrival on the field of battle by the Prussians under Marshall Blucher, defeated the French ending, once and for all, the threat of Napoleon. It was a closely fought battle and but for the courage and skill under pressure of the unflappable and ever-cool Wellington, the bravery of his troops and some uncharacteristic indecisiveness by Napoleon things could have turned out rather differently. Indeed, Wellington himself referred to his victory as “the nearest run thing you ever saw in your life”.
For Britain, the victory meant the removal of the threat of invasion and for the next 100 years she lived in prosperity and for the main part in peace (an era known as “Pax Britannica”) free to develop the greatest empire the world had ever seen. I wonder how many of our schoolchildren know of this day and, for that matter, how many of their teachers?
The Queen’s Diamond Jubilee
Whatever your views on the monarchy, it has to be said that our Queen has been a wonderful servant to her country and to her Commonwealth. In 60 years of unbroken and dedicated service she has witnessed some of the most significant events ever witnessed by mankind. Man has landed on the moon, has made vast leaps in medicine and technology and has created the internet which perhaps more than any other invention or discovery has quite simply revolutionised our lives.
She has witnessed too the sad decline of her country and the break-up of the once all-powerful British Empire. She has seen incredible social change and a total revolution in the way we now live our lives. There are still some (a small minority it has to be said) who would prefer a republic and a leader elected democratically by the people, a politician with all the bias and prejudice that that would entail, a vote winner anxious to cling to power at whatever cost. Can you imagine a President Blair or Brown? No, monarchy may have its faults (and I have never agreed with inherited privilege) but it is the best system we could have and is far better than the alternative.
Eight of ten Britons were born during her reign and still she is there with us, the one constant, comfort even, in all our lives. The fact that she is held with such obvious love and affection by her people is a huge tribute to her dedication and service to us all. Her reign should be celebrated and treasured because we will never see her like again.
The Last Englishman
Happy St George’s Day!
The Falklands
It seems that the Falkland Islands are never far from the news with Argentina’s refusal to keep the islands out of the international spotlight. In spite of, and maybe because of, their defeat in 1982 Argentina continues to lay claim to the islands that they refer to as Las Malvinas and has recently stepped up those claims. As far as international law is concerned the Falklands, despite their physical proximity to Argentina, remain a sovereign territory and a part of the British Commonwealth. The population, small though it is, remains English-speaking and 100% committed to maintaining its links to the UK. That really should be an end to the matter but, of course, things are never that simple.
The latest flare-up has arisen through two matters, I suspect, namely the potentially rich oil and gas deposits off the islands and political opportunism by an Argentine president, anxious to cling on to political power. The UK has responded, though it may be coincidence, by sending to the islands a Royal Prince as well as a state of the art warship from our dwindling navy. Today the Argentines have stated that we also have a nuclear submarine in the area or at least on its way there.
So what does all this mean? Is it mere rhetoric by the Argentine president or is it something more sinister? Are the islands at risk once more and is there a danger that Argentina, aware of the fact that we have weakened considerably since 1982, may be prepared to have another go. If they are, then are we capable of successfully defending the islands once more and will there be the political will and public support to see it through? Difficult questions and none of them are easy to answer, though I feel the public would most probably support a defence of British sovereign territory and I’m sure that the Prime Minister would be equally supportive.
However, the problem remains that it is a conflict that we could lose and clearly we should do everything we could to avoid any escalation towards that conflict. We are no longer the force that we were. On the world stage we have considerably declined economically, militarily and politically and 19th century style gunboat diplomacy is no longer an option for us. In 1982 we successfully defended the islands through the political will of Margaret Thatcher and a well organised and equipped task force backed fully by public opinion. We were also fortunate to have American support and luckier still to face a poorly equipped enemy, half of whose bombs and shells failed to explode even when they hit the target.
This time, I doubt we’ll get the same support from President Obama as we got from the anglophile President Reagan and I don’t think we should rely on faulty Argentine weaponry either. If relations continue to deteriorate between Argentina and the UK we may well have no option but to place the whole issue in the lap of the United Nations; a bitter pill to swallow but better than military humiliation.