What’s in a Name?

Earlier this week a list of the top twenty UK baby names was released and, in spite of myself (being neither an expectant father nor knowing  any parents-to-be) I couldn’t resist the temptation to have a peek, if only to see if my apparently antiquated name is making a comeback. It isn’t, but the list still made interesting reading.

Top of the list for boys is Oliver followed by Jack and Harry. All good solid names with a nice British ring, although I was a little mystified by name number 11, Noah. I’ve never met a Noah nor even heard of one other than the famous captain of the Ark. Why would you call your son Noah, unless you are a student of the Old Testament or have an interest in boats or floods? Numbers 4 (Jacob) and 13 (Joshua) also seem to reflect an interest in the Bible and number 14 ( Muhammed) is indicative of the ever-changing face of modern Britain.

As for the girls, Amelia is top which surprised me a little since the only Amelia I can think of is the famous American pilot and adventurer, Amelia Earhart, who in 1932 became the first woman to fly solo across the Atlantic and who later disappeared whilst attempting a round the world flight in 1937. Second and third are Olivia and Isla followed by Emily and Poppy, two fairly traditional and pretty British names. Number 19 is Chloe which brings back memories of a family cat but other than that the girl’s top twenty produces nothing too out of the ordinary.

Baby names, on the whole, seem to be a reflection of the times and seemingly consign many of us, far removed from the top 20, the Johns, Davids and Peters, the Elizabeths, Marys and  Annes to the scrap heap of pre-history.  We must try not to take it too personally!

Last of the Dambusters

The news that Squadron Leader Les Munro, the last surviving pilot of the famous Dambusters, had died earlier this week in his native New Zealand at the age of 96, provided a poignant reminder of a time that now seems like aeons ago.

In fact, it is just over 72 years since 133 RAF pilots and crew set off in their Lancaster bombers from RAF Scampton, Lincolnshire on the night of May 16th, 1943 to bomb the Moehne, Eder and Sorpe dams in Germany, names firmly engraved in the memory of many a post-war British schoolboy.

Of the 133 airmen only 77 returned and whilst the mission largely achieved its objectives it didn’t cripple the German war effort as was hoped. The raid did however capture the imagination of the long-suffering British public and provided a massive boost to morale and national prestige after nearly 4 years of war and suffering.

There are now only two surviving crew left from the raid, old men now of course, and the death of Squadron Leader Munro is a reminder of how much we owe to all of those airmen both British and Allied, and of course to Roy Chadwick, the designer of the Avro Lancaster and Barnes Wallis ingenious inventor of the famous bouncing bomb which caused such damage to the dams.

Rewriting History

I recently read an article in the Independent newspaper on the subject of the battle of Waterloo and the forthcoming celebrations to commemorate the 200th anniversary of the British and Allied victory of June 18th, 1815. The writer said that the victory was of little importance, argued that the British (and particularly the English) played a small part and went on to say that the winning general was Irish.

It is of course fashionable, particularly among the country’s liberal elite, to question Britain’s achievements and wherever possible to belittle them and even to rewrite history, so it’s worth looking at those statements.

Waterloo, as Wellington himself said, was a “near run thing” and if Napoleon had won who knows what might have happened?  The whole of Europe was ranged against Napoleon, and his plan, born of necessity,  was for a quick victory in Belgium over Wellington’s British Allied army and Blucher’s Prussians before turning east to face the armies of Russia and Austria.

He almost succeeded and the fact that he didn’t was down primarily, in the opinion of most military historians, to the abilities of Wellington, the quality of the 20,000 British troops and 6,000 troops of the King’s German Legion under his command (totalling less than one third of his forces) plus the eventual late arrival on the field of battle of Blucher’s Prussians.

If  Napoleon had won the battle who is to say what the effect would have been on the morale of the Austrians and Russians? Would they have fancied their chances against his undoubted military genius? Might they instead have sued for peace? What would have happened to Europe? Who knows? It is, of course, mere conjecture

As for Wellington’s nationality, he was of Anglo-Irish protestant stock, born in Dublin and educated at Eton. He regarded himself as English and when referred to as Irish, due to his place of birth, he is alleged to have replied “If I had been born in a stable would that make me a horse?”

None of that is to derogate the Irish who contributed mightily to the history of this country and her former empire but it would be nice if certain modern commentators could at least give the English some credit.

NOTE: On the anniversary of the battle of Trafalgar I half expect some revisionist to declare that Nelson wasn’t English either – actually, when you think about it Horati O’Nelson does sound a little suspicious!

Learning from the Past

The other day, I was relaxing and listening to some music by one of my favourite artists, Sting. One of the songs was called “History will teach us nothing” which I have always found to be an interesting title, open to more than one interpretation.

In the sense that he meant (and I’m sure he did) that future generations of human beings should not copy the behaviour of their forbears and repeat some of the dreadful mistakes made by them who could possibly disagree? However, it would be wrong to think that we can learn nothing from history per se.

History is actually the best teacher of all since we can learn a great deal from not only our own experiences but also, of course, from the experiences of others. Any responsible parent will tell you that. Don’t touch that hot pan, it will burn you.

We can always learn from others and we can undoubtedly learn from history. This occurred to me a couple of days ago when, in the company of a group of Germans and French, I thought back to what we would have been doing to one another a hundred years ago, and again just thirty years later.

We can learn, thank God, but we need to remember the words of philosopher, George Santayana, who said “Those who cannot remember the past are doomed to repeat it”.

The Little Boats

Tomorrow, sees the 75th anniversary of the  decision to evacuate the British army from the beaches of Dunkirk following its retreat from an advancing German army that had hitherto conquered all before it.

On May 27th, 1940 the evacuation, codenamed Operation Dynamo, began and lasted until June 4th when over 300,000 British soldiers, along with several thousand of their French counterparts, were transported across the English Channel to safety.

Although they had to leave the vast majority of their weapons  behind them, the successful evacuation, by the Royal Navy and hundreds of small civilian boats, captured the imagination of the British public and proved an immeasurable boost to morale in what were undoubtedly Britain’s darkest days.

Of course, the respite was temporary and many major battles lay ahead, not least the Battle of Britain, just weeks later, when the RAF defied the might of the German Luftwaffe and safeguarded the British Isles from the grim fate that befell the rest of Europe. Dunkirk may well have been a retreat and a defeat but it felt like a victory.

Those little boats will live forever in the memory of this nation not least for the hope that they gave to a people who, prior to that successful evacuation, must have almost forgotten what the word meant.

Happy Saint George’s Day!

Today is St George’s Day, the national day of England. But where are all the flags and why aren’t we enjoying a public holiday in celebration? Well, actually, we English don’t really make that much of a fuss. Perhaps it’s something to do with our famous reserve.

Most English, typifying the phlegm and understatement, for which we are renowned,  are content to quietly slip under the radar just muddling along in true English fashion. Times have changed of course and a patriotic Victorian would barely recognise the England of today, or would he?

The reserve is still there, so too the inventiveness and wit, though few of today’s English leaders would be able to match the wit of Lord Palmerston, the great 19th century Foreign Secretary and Prime Minister.

Evidently a fawning French diplomat (aren’t they all?) once said to the great man “If I were not French, I would wish to be English” to which Palmerston replied “If I was not English, I would wish to be English”.

I’ll drink to that! In fact, in a couple of hours time I will be doing so in the company of forty like-minded, red rose-wearing Englishmen celebrating our national day by enjoying some roast beef washed down by flagons of English ale. Actually most of us will be drinking French and Australian wine but English ale sounds so much better, doesn’t it!

May I leave the last word (literally) to Lord Palmerston.  As he lay on his death bed, fussed over by anxious medical staff, he exclaimed  “Die my dear doctor, that is the last thing I shall do”! An English wit to the end!

A Happy Saint George’s Day to one and all!

Bad Losers

Evidently Francois Hollande, the French president, has vetoed Belgium’s proposal for the issue of a special two euro coin to commemorate the 200th anniversary of the battle of Waterloo on June 18th.

You may consider the attitude of such a staunch supporter of the European Union to be somewhat surprising, particularly when the allied victory freed Europe from the tyranny of the French dictator, Napoleon Bonaparte, and led to over 50 years of peace on the continent. However, Hollande feels the coin might undermine European unity and would “risk engendering unfavourable reactions in France”.

Of course, the real reason for the President’s snub is that Bonaparte was defeated by a largely British force led by the Duke of Wellington and the fact of the matter is that, in spite of centuries of practice, the French have always been such bad losers.

I suggest that instead of leaving it to the Europeans, the British government should order the striking of a two pound sterling coin to commemorate the battle. On one side of the coin would be an engraving of a charging British grenadier and on the reverse a troop of fleeing French cuirassiers. That would really irritate his eminence, the French president, wouldn’t it!

The Best Act of Remembrance

Unsurprisingly, most of the major news stories of the last few days have focussed on the memorial services taking place throughout the land to mark yesterday’s Remembrance Sunday and tomorrow’s Armistice Day. The services are all the more poignant this year since, as we are all aware, 2014 is the centenary of the outbreak of World War 1.

In the midst of the tales of suffering, courage and death one particular newspaper article seemed to me to strike an important chord. It was an interview in the Sunday Times with Michael Morpurgo, the novelist and author of “War Horse” who said that every British school pupil should be given the opportunity to visit the cemeteries of the Western Front of Belgium and France with the cost being borne by the State if necessary.

His argument was that children, in many cases obsessed by computer war games, need “to understand the human tragedy of conflict”.

That has to be right. Though we must never forget, and should always honour, the memories of those who suffered and died in the terrible conflicts of the Twentieth century and beyond surely the best possible act of remembrance is to do all that we can to ensure that the mistakes of the past are never repeated by future generations.

The Conquest of England

Tomorrow is the anniversary of the battle of Hastings, a battle which took place in a year once imprinted on the brain of every English child with even the bare smattering of an education. Nowadays I’d be surprised if even a quarter of English people under the age of 20 could correctly name the year of the battle that shaped the future of their country for the next one thousand years or so.

It was always a big ask of King Harold’s English army to defeat the highly trained and fresh army of Guillame (William) of Normandy , just recently landed from across the Channel, when his own soldiers were exhausted just days after gaining a victory over William’s Viking allies at Stamford Bridge near York. The English had made a forced march over a distance of some 300 miles to meet the Norman threat and were hardly in the best of conditions to confront the second prong of the invasion of their country on that fateful morning of October 14th, 1066.

William the Conqueror’s victory spelt the end of Anglo-Saxon rule and ushered in a reign of terror with all subsequent resistance and rebellion crushed with ruthless brutality. Let nobody be in any doubt that the English suffered terribly under the cruel reign of the Normans and their harsh feudal system, aspects of which are still recognisable to this day in our anachronistic class system. Vast swathes of land were laid waste by the conquerors who wiped out whole communities all over England, particularly in the north. Such action is now referred to as ethnic cleansing or genocide.

We hear much of how badly the Irish, Welsh and Scots were treated by the “English”, meaning the ruling class of the England and a class that for nearly 300 years, until the late 14th century, spoke only French and treated English speakers as inferior serfs. By contrast we hear little of the sufferings of the English common folk. That could well be because the English have accepted it and moved on or maybe because it is just not in the English nature to wallow in sentiment and self pity.

October 14th, 1066 marked the beginning of the end of a largely peace-loving and inward-looking England concerned more by its own culture than by foreign adventure. The Norman conquest changed that forever and the country’s ruthless new rulers set out to subjugate the whole of the British Isles followed by conquest in France and beyond.

Maybe now, with the very real prospect of the dissolution of the United Kingdom, the wheel will turn full circle and England can revert once more to her pre-1066 position, a nation apart from her Celtic neighbours with an emphasis on England and all things English. Mere romance perhaps but a pleasant thought for many of us nevertheless.

The Commonwealth

The Commonwealth Games, which finished last week, turned out to be the great success that we had all hoped for. The host nation, Scotland, did an excellent job in organising and presenting the Games and it was wonderful to see so many athletes from across the world competing so hard to win medals for their countries.

As an Englishman, I was obviously delighted that England finished overall champions but that was almost by the by since the thing that impressed me most of all was the wide diversity of the competing nations.

To many, the Commonwealth is simply an anachronism representing, at is it does, the last reminders of the former British Empire. But what a reminder it is. Even a brief look at the location of member nations such as Canada, Jamaica, South Africa, Kenya, India and Australia is to take a lesson in world geography. All four corners of the globe touched by our tiny island.

It was all a long time ago of course, but not that long. History shows that all empires inevitably decline and fall and the beginning of Britain’s decline can be traced back to a date commemorated across the world earlier this week. That date was August 4th 1914, the beginning of the First World War, a war that claimed over a million British and Empire lives and sent the Empire on a downward financial spiral from which it never recovered.